State PSO Narkhed vs Jagannath mahadevrao Satpute — 402/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005672026

Filing Number

502/2026

Filing Date

11-Mar-2026

Registration No

402/2026

Registration Date

11-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State PSO Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jagannath mahadevrao Satpute

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.G.C. No. 402/2026 The court convicted Jagannath Mahadeo Satpute for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after being informed of the consequences in Marathi. The court accepted the guilty plea, noting the nature of the offense, the accused's poverty, lack of previous criminal antecedents, and mitigating circumstances warranting leniency. Satpute was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 402/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.G.C. No. 402/2026 The court convicted Jagannath Mahadeo Satpute for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty after being informed of the consequences in Marathi. The court accepted the guilty plea, noting the nature of the offense, the accused's poverty, lack of previous criminal antecedents, and mitigating circumstances warranting leniency. Satpute was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case