State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Rajendra Laxman Vinchurkar — 391/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120005422026
e-Filing Number
10-03-2026
Filing Number
477/2026
Filing Date
10-03-2026
Registration No
391/2026
Registration Date
10-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Decision Date
09th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
647
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Rajendra Laxman Vinchurkar
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 09-05-2026 | Disposed |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: Rajesh Laxman Vinchurkar, a 59-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for an offense committed on 19/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days' simple imprisonment in default. Seized property including Rs. 200 was forfeited to the State Government and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Rajesh Laxman Vinchurkar, a 59-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for an offense committed on 19/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days' simple imprisonment in default. Seized property including Rs. 200 was forfeited to the State Government and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts