State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Premlal Bhagwan Prasad Patel — 367/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120005282026
e-Filing Number
09-03-2026
Filing Number
465/2026
Filing Date
09-Mar-2026
Registration No
367/2026
Registration Date
09-Mar-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
108
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Premlal Bhagwan Prasad Patel
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 367/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Premlal Bhagwan Prasad Patel under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (vide Section 275 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after he pleaded guilty. The court accepted his guilty plea as voluntary and considered the mitigating factors—his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence—to impose a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or, in default, 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
09-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 367/2026
Case 367/2026 Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Premlal Bhagwan Prasad Patel under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (vide Section 275 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after he pleaded guilty. The court accepted his guilty plea as voluntary and considered the mitigating factors—his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence—to impose a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine or, in default, 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts