State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Pradip Dipak Waghmare — 360/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005212026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

458/2026

Filing Date

09-Mar-2026

Registration No

360/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

86

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pradip Dipak Waghmare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pradip Dipak Waghmare for an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Given his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  5. 09-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 09-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 360/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Judicial Magistrate convicted Pradip Dipak Waghmare for an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. Given his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence, the court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case