State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed vs Rupesh Hiraman Tadamkar — 349/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120005082026

Filing Number

450/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

349/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

09-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rupesh Hiraman Tadamkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 09-May-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary (349/2026) Rupesh Hiraman Tadamkar, age 27, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence committed on 09/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed. Considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-May-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 27-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  5. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  6. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 349/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (349/2026) Rupesh Hiraman Tadamkar, age 27, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offence committed on 09/02/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed. Considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, or three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case