State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Jivan Bapuravaji Ramteke — 338/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004902026

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

435/2026

Filing Date

02-Mar-2026

Registration No

338/2026

Registration Date

02-Mar-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

630

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Jivan Bapuravaji Ramteke

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In Case 338/2026, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Narkhed convicted Jivan Bapuraoji Ramteke (age 53) of violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the offense. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 02-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 02-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 338/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In Case 338/2026, the Judicial Magistrate First Class, Narkhed convicted Jivan Bapuraoji Ramteke (age 53) of violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty to the offense. Considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case