State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Mayur Sheshrao Pardhi — 337/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120004882026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
433/2026
Filing Date
02-03-2026
Registration No
337/2026
Registration Date
02-03-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
642
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Mayur Sheshrao Pardhi
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 02-03-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 337/2026 Mayur Sheshrao Pardhi, age 35, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences committed on 18/12/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being informed of the charges in Marathi. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days additional imprisonment in default), taking a lenient view given his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record. Seized property worth Rs. 240 was forfeited to the State Government and gambling equipment (sattapatti and ball pen) was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 337/2026 Mayur Sheshrao Pardhi, age 35, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences committed on 18/12/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after being informed of the charges in Marathi. The court sentenced him to simple imprisonment until the rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days additional imprisonment in default), taking a lenient view given his poor financial condition and lack of prior criminal record. Seized property worth Rs. 240 was forfeited to the State Government and gambling equipment (sattapatti and ball pen) was ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts