State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Lalit Sidhdarth Sardar — 330/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004692026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

415/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

330/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

36

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Lalit Sidhdarth Sardar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    The accused Lalit Sidharth Sardar pleaded guilty to charges under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea, noting his voluntary admission despite understanding the consequences, his poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal record. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, serve three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 330/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The accused Lalit Sidharth Sardar pleaded guilty to charges under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his guilty plea, noting his voluntary admission despite understanding the consequences, his poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal record. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, serve three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case