State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Vikas Yadavrao Botare — 322/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004622026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

408/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

322/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

119

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Vikas Yadavrao Botare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 322/2026 The accused, Vikas Yadavrao Botare, pleaded guilty to charges under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his impoverished status, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 24-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 24-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 322/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 322/2026 The accused, Vikas Yadavrao Botare, pleaded guilty to charges under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his impoverished status, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case