State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dipak Jaladevsingh Chavan — 311/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004512026

e-Filing Number

24-02-2026

Filing Number

397/2026

Filing Date

24-Feb-2026

Registration No

311/2026

Registration Date

24-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Dipak Jaladevsingh Chavan

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 311/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Dipak Jaladevsingh Chavan for an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200/- fine and 3 days simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor financial condition, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
24-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
24-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 311/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 311/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted accused Dipak Jaladevsingh Chavan for an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200/- fine and 3 days simple imprisonment in default, considering his poor financial condition, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.