Devkabai Sahebrao Wasade vs Kamlabai Mahadev Kharpkar — 34/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section suit TI 151. Status: Evidence. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.
R.C.S. - Reg.Civil Suit
CNR: MHNG120004482022
Next Hearing
24th June 2026
Filing Number
71/2022
Filing Date
02-05-2022
Registration No
34/2022
Registration Date
02-05-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Devkabai Sahebrao Wasade
Adv. Adv. M. R. Charde
Sinddhu Ashokrao Tatte
Mira Ashokrao Thote
Sushila Dnyaneshwar Guddhe
Rahul Subhashrao Junghare
Mangla Vishvnath Bokde
Respondent(s)
Kamlabai Mahadev Kharpkar
Shobha Prakash Lunge
Gita Yuraj Wankhede
Savita Anil Potadar
Laxmi @ Sanchita Dinesh Shastri
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-04-2026 | Evidence |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 18-02-2026 | Evidence |
| 09-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 02-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
Case 34/2022 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from creating third-party interests over the suit property. Plaintiffs alleged defendants fraudulently mutated 3000 sq.ft. in their names when the deceased's Will only transferred 1500 sq.ft. to them. The court found an immediate threat of alienation and issued notice to defendants returnable on 10/06/2022 to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be made permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 34/2022 Summary: The court granted an ex-parte ad-interim injunction restraining defendants from creating third-party interests over the suit property. Plaintiffs alleged defendants fraudulently mutated 3000 sq.ft. in their names when the deceased's Will only transferred 1500 sq.ft. to them. The court found an immediate threat of alienation and issued notice to defendants returnable on 10/06/2022 to show cause why the temporary injunction should not be made permanent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts