State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Shiv Ramsing Nahania — 333/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004402026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

386/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

333/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

31

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shiv Ramsing Nahania

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 333/2026 Summary: Shiv Ramsing Nahaniya, age 23, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 25/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of previous criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 333/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 333/2026 Summary: Shiv Ramsing Nahaniya, age 23, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 25/01/2026. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily before the Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed. Considering his poverty, lack of previous criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case