State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Khushal Parasram Laisinh — 331/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004372026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

383/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

331/2026

Registration Date

26-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

46

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Khushal Parasram Laisinh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 331/2026 The court convicted Khushal Parasram Laisih under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 210 was forfeited to the state, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 26-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 331/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 331/2026 The court convicted Khushal Parasram Laisih under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 210 was forfeited to the state, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case