State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Khushal Parasram Laisinh — 331/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120004372026
e-Filing Number
23-02-2026
Filing Number
383/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
331/2026
Registration Date
26-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
46
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Khushal Parasram Laisinh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 26-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 331/2026 The court convicted Khushal Parasram Laisih under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 210 was forfeited to the state, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 331/2026 The court convicted Khushal Parasram Laisih under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty to gambling charges. Considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the magistrate imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (or 3 days imprisonment in default). Seized cash of Rs. 210 was forfeited to the state, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts