State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar — 299/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004342026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

380/2026

Filing Date

23-02-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

23-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

14-03-2026

Disposed

23-02-2026

Awaiting Summons

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
Issues

Case Summary: State v. Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar (299/2026) Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment). Seized property of Rs. 580 was forfeited to the State, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar (299/2026) Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment). Seized property of Rs. 580 was forfeited to the State, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case