State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar — 299/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004342026

e-Filing Number

23-02-2026

Filing Number

380/2026

Filing Date

23-Feb-2026

Registration No

299/2026

Registration Date

23-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    IssuesView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar (299/2026) Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment). Seized property of Rs. 580 was forfeited to the State, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 23-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 23-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 299/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar (299/2026) Kishor Ashokrao Hatekar was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for gambling offences. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offence: simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment). Seized property of Rs. 580 was forfeited to the State, while gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case