State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Ritesh Laxman Vaiday — 242/2025
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120004342025
e-Filing Number
19-03-2025
Filing Number
333/2025
Filing Date
19-03-2025
Registration No
242/2025
Registration Date
20-03-2025
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
125
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Ritesh Laxman Vaiday
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 03-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 10-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-09-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: 242/2025 State of Maharashtra v. Ritesh Laxman Vaidya Ritesh Laxman Vaidya, a 24-year-old laborer, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 26/02/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and, considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the minor nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 3 days simple imprisonment in default (14/03/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: 242/2025 State of Maharashtra v. Ritesh Laxman Vaidya Ritesh Laxman Vaidya, a 24-year-old laborer, was charged under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense on 26/02/2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. The court convicted him and, considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the minor nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 3 days simple imprisonment in default (14/03/2026). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts