State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Suresh Vyenkati Jadhav — 292/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004202026

e-Filing Number

18-02-2026

Filing Number

367/2026

Filing Date

18-Feb-2026

Registration No

292/2026

Registration Date

18-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

32

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Suresh Vyenkati Jadhav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: State v. Suresh Vyankati Jadhav (292/2026) The accused Suresh Vyankati Jadhav pleaded guilty to gambling offence under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, sentencing him to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment), taking a lenient view given his poverty and lack of prior criminal record. Seized cash of Rs. 510 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 18-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 18-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 292/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: State v. Suresh Vyankati Jadhav (292/2026) The accused Suresh Vyankati Jadhav pleaded guilty to gambling offence under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, sentencing him to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment), taking a lenient view given his poverty and lack of prior criminal record. Seized cash of Rs. 510 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case