State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Suresh Vyenkati Jadhav — 292/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120004202026
e-Filing Number
18-02-2026
Filing Number
367/2026
Filing Date
18-02-2026
Registration No
292/2026
Registration Date
18-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
32
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
Suresh Vyenkati Jadhav
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary: State v. Suresh Vyankati Jadhav (292/2026) The accused Suresh Vyankati Jadhav pleaded guilty to gambling offence under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, sentencing him to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment), taking a lenient view given his poverty and lack of prior criminal record. Seized cash of Rs. 510 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: State v. Suresh Vyankati Jadhav (292/2026) The accused Suresh Vyankati Jadhav pleaded guilty to gambling offence under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, sentencing him to simple imprisonment till rising of court plus a fine of Rs. 200 (default: 3 days imprisonment), taking a lenient view given his poverty and lack of prior criminal record. Seized cash of Rs. 510 was forfeited to the State Government, and gambling materials were ordered destroyed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts