State Excise Dept. Nagpur vs Vivek Ramdasji Raut Advocate - Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar — 215/2023
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 68,84. Disposed: Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC on 12th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120004172023
Filing Number
347/2023
Filing Date
24-04-2023
Registration No
215/2023
Registration Date
24-04-2023
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--U/SEC. 258 OF CR.PC
FIR Details
FIR Number
117
Police Station
St. Excise Dept Nagpur
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Excise Dept. Nagpur
Adv. APP 2
Respondent(s)
Vivek Ramdasji Raut Advocate - Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar
Bhimrao Ramraoji Narnaware
Adv. Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar
Harshal Ashokrao Narnaware
Adv. Adv. S. T. Kshirsagar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 21-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
| 13-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 09-12-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
| 15-11-2025 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against three accused (Vivek Raut and others) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding the matter stale and ineffective due to prosecution's failure to secure their presence despite multiple opportunities and lack of follow-up. All three accused were discharged from charges under Sections 68 and 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and their bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court stopped proceedings under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code against three accused (Vivek Raut and others) in a Maharashtra Prohibition Act case, finding the matter stale and ineffective due to prosecution's failure to secure their presence despite multiple opportunities and lack of follow-up. All three accused were discharged from charges under Sections 68 and 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, and their bail bonds were cancelled. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts