State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dipak Vitthal Dongare — 275/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004062026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

357/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

275/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

118

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dipak Vitthal Dongare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    In case S.C.C. No. 275/2026, the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed convicted Dipak Vitthal Dongare for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days, taking a lenient view considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 17-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 275/2026

casestatus.in Summary

In case S.C.C. No. 275/2026, the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed convicted Dipak Vitthal Dongare for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he pleaded guilty. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days, taking a lenient view considering his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case