State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Rajesh Haribhau Tayade — 277/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004052026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

356/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

277/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

110

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Rajesh Haribhau Tayade

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: Rajesh Haribhau Tayade, a 50-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance acquisition). The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poverty and lack of criminal antecedents, and adopted a lenient view regarding sentencing. The court convicted Tayade and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
17-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 277/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Rajesh Haribhau Tayade, a 50-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance acquisition). The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poverty and lack of criminal antecedents, and adopted a lenient view regarding sentencing. The court convicted Tayade and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, with a default provision of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.