State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Sudhir Dhanraj Dhoke — 274/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120004032026

e-Filing Number

17-02-2026

Filing Number

354/2026

Filing Date

17-Feb-2026

Registration No

274/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

103

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Sudhir Dhanraj Dhoke

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: 274/2026 The court convicted Sudhir Dhanraj Dhoke under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The magistrate accepted his plea as voluntary, noting his impoverished circumstances, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense warranted a lenient approach. Dhoke was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200 with a default simple imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
17-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
17-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 274/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 274/2026 The court convicted Sudhir Dhanraj Dhoke under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he pleaded guilty to the charges. The magistrate accepted his plea as voluntary, noting his impoverished circumstances, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense warranted a lenient approach. Dhoke was sentenced to a fine of Rs. 200 with a default simple imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.