Anangodsing Laxmansing Chauhan vs Vijay Pundlikrao Rewatkar — 95/2020

Case under Code of Criminal Procedure Section 200. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 06th April 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG120003952020

Case disposed

Filing Number

367/2020

Filing Date

09-06-2020

Registration No

95/2020

Registration Date

09-06-2020

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

06th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

CODE OF CRIMINAL PROCEDURE Section 200
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT Section 138
INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 420

Petitioner(s)

Anangodsing Laxmansing Chauhan

Adv. Adv. M. P. Tiwari

Respondent(s)

Vijay Pundlikrao Rewatkar

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

06-04-2026

Disposed

14-03-2026

Hearing

07-03-2026

Hearing

07-02-2026

Hearing

20-01-2026

Hearing

Final Orders / Judgements

06-04-2026
Order on Exhibit

Case Summary: Cri. M.A. 95/2020 The court allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of 50 days delay in filing a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against the respondent for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 50,000. The court found the delay justified due to Covid-19 pandemic constraints and accepted the petitioner's explanation that despite issuing a legal notice (rejected by the respondent), he could not file the complaint within the statutory one-month period. The court directed registration of the complaint filed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cri. M.A. 95/2020 The court allowed the petitioner's application for condonation of 50 days delay in filing a Section 138 Negotiable Instruments Act complaint against the respondent for dishonor of a cheque worth Rs. 50,000. The court found the delay justified due to Covid-19 pandemic constraints and accepted the petitioner's explanation that despite issuing a legal notice (rejected by the respondent), he could not file the complaint within the statutory one-month period. The court directed registration of the complaint filed with the application. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case