State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Ashish Vasudev Vadbudhe — 244/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003742026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

326/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

244/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Ashish Vasudev Vadbudhe

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ashish Vasudev Vadbudhe under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (endangering life or personal safety by act of negligence) and Section 275 (act negligent with respect to poison). The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- and, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offense, the accused's poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
13-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 244/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ashish Vasudev Vadbudhe under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (endangering life or personal safety by act of negligence) and Section 275 (act negligent with respect to poison). The court sentenced the accused to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- and, in default, to suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days, taking a lenient view given the nature of the offense, the accused's poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.