State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Atul Rajeshwar Giri — 250/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003592026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

314/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

250/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

41

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Atul Rajeshwar Giri

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 250/2026 Summary: Atul Rajeshwar Giri (age 46, laborer) pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to substance acquisition. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the offense's nature warranted leniency. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, simple imprisonment for three days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 250/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 250/2026 Summary: Atul Rajeshwar Giri (age 46, laborer) pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, relating to substance acquisition. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the offense's nature warranted leniency. He was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, simple imprisonment for three days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case