State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Asaram Umaraoji Narnware — 254/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120003552026
e-Filing Number
13-02-2026
Filing Number
310/2026
Filing Date
13-Feb-2026
Registration No
254/2026
Registration Date
13-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
23
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Asaram Umaraoji Narnware
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.G. No. 254/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Asaram Umaraoji Narnware, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for an offense committed on 23/01/2026. He pleaded guilty voluntarily and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, or in default, undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense in adopting a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
13-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 254/2026
Case Summary: S.C.G. No. 254/2026 Court Decision: The accused, Asaram Umaraoji Narnware, was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for an offense committed on 23/01/2026. He pleaded guilty voluntarily and was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/-, or in default, undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days. The court accepted his guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense in adopting a lenient view. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts