State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Bhumeshwar Baliram Parate — 239/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003542026

e-Filing Number

13-02-2026

Filing Number

309/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

239/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

1.Bhumeshwar Baliram Parate

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 239/2026 Decision: The court convicted Bhumeshwar Baliram Parate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the offense of acquisition under Section 274. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. Sentence: Fine of Rs. 200/-, and in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. The court applied a lenient view considering the accused's poor financial status, lack of previous criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
13-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
13-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 239/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 239/2026 Decision: The court convicted Bhumeshwar Baliram Parate under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for the offense of acquisition under Section 274. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. Sentence: Fine of Rs. 200/-, and in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. The court applied a lenient view considering the accused's poor financial status, lack of previous criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.