Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare vs State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed — 33/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG120003452026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
303/2026
Filing Date
12-02-2026
Registration No
33/2026
Registration Date
12-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare
Adv. CHARDE MANOJ RAMESHRAO
Respondent(s)
State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Order
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
Reply/Say
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 13-03-2026 | Order | |
| 10-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 06-03-2026 | Reply/Say | |
| 27-02-2026 | Reply/Say |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary: The court allowed the application and ordered the release of three seized bulls to the applicant Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare, the registered owner, subject to strict conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and payment of ₹200 daily maintenance charges to the Goshala (animal shelter) where they were kept. The court imposed safeguards to prevent animal cruelty: the applicant must not slaughter, harm, or mistreat the animals, cannot transfer ownership during trial, and the investigating officer must document the animals' condition through photographs, medical examination, and detailed records before and after release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary: The court allowed the application and ordered the release of three seized bulls to the applicant Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare, the registered owner, subject to strict conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and payment of ₹200 daily maintenance charges to the Goshala (animal shelter) where they were kept. The court imposed safeguards to prevent animal cruelty: the applicant must not slaughter, harm, or mistreat the animals, cannot transfer ownership during trial, and the investigating officer must document the animals' condition through photographs, medical examination, and detailed records before and after release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts