Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare vs State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed — 33/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE on 16th March 2026.

Cri.M.A.

CNR: MHNG120003452026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

303/2026

Filing Date

12-02-2026

Registration No

33/2026

Registration Date

12-02-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

16th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED OTHERWISE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 503

Petitioner(s)

Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare

Adv. CHARDE MANOJ RAMESHRAO

Respondent(s)

State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Hearing History

Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

16-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

Order

10-03-2026

Reply/Say

06-03-2026

Reply/Say

27-02-2026

Reply/Say

Final Orders / Judgements

16-03-2026
Order on Exhibit

Summary: The court allowed the application and ordered the release of three seized bulls to the applicant Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare, the registered owner, subject to strict conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and payment of ₹200 daily maintenance charges to the Goshala (animal shelter) where they were kept. The court imposed safeguards to prevent animal cruelty: the applicant must not slaughter, harm, or mistreat the animals, cannot transfer ownership during trial, and the investigating officer must document the animals' condition through photographs, medical examination, and detailed records before and after release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The court allowed the application and ordered the release of three seized bulls to the applicant Chandrabhan Maroti Kosare, the registered owner, subject to strict conditions including execution of a ₹50,000 indemnity bond and payment of ₹200 daily maintenance charges to the Goshala (animal shelter) where they were kept. The court imposed safeguards to prevent animal cruelty: the applicant must not slaughter, harm, or mistreat the animals, cannot transfer ownership during trial, and the investigating officer must document the animals' condition through photographs, medical examination, and detailed records before and after release. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case