State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Shankar Yadav Panchabhai — 229/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120003412026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
299/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
229/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
71
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shankar Yadav Panchabhai
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 229/2026 Shankar Yadav Panchbhai, a 53-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his lack of criminal antecedents and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
28-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 229/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 229/2026 Shankar Yadav Panchbhai, a 53-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his voluntary plea and convicted him, imposing a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine (or 3 days simple imprisonment in default) considering his lack of criminal antecedents and financial hardship. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts