State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Shuseel Ajabarao Pohane — 230/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 09th May 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120003392026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
297/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
230/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
09-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
75
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Shuseel Ajabarao Pohane
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-May-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 230/2026 Sushil Ajabrao Pohane pleaded guilty to violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, considering his lack of prior criminal record and financial hardship. Decision: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-May-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
27-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 230/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 230/2026 Sushil Ajabrao Pohane pleaded guilty to violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The court accepted his voluntary guilty plea and convicted him, considering his lack of prior criminal record and financial hardship. Decision: The accused was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, to undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts