State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Kishor Bhagwat Satpute — 222/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003382026

e-Filing Number

10-02-2026

Filing Number

296/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

222/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

68

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Kishor Bhagwat Satpute

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary (222/2026): Kishor Bhagwat Satpute was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for substance acquisition. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges explained in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the nature of the offense, the accused's poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and voluntary plea. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 222/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (222/2026): Kishor Bhagwat Satpute was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 for substance acquisition. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges explained in Marathi. The court imposed a lenient sentence considering the nature of the offense, the accused's poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and voluntary plea. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or undergo simple imprisonment for 3 days in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case