State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Pawan Pandhari Bansod — 228/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003362026

e-Filing Number

11-02-2026

Filing Number

294/2026

Filing Date

11-Feb-2026

Registration No

228/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

72

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Pawan Pandhari Bansod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 228/2026 Summary: Pawan Pandhari Bansod (age 25, laborer) pleaded guilty to violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200/- with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. The conviction was accepted after the accused voluntarily admitted guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 11-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 11-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 228/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 228/2026 Summary: Pawan Pandhari Bansod (age 25, laborer) pleaded guilty to violating Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the nature of the offense, imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200/- with 3 days simple imprisonment in default. The conviction was accepted after the accused voluntarily admitted guilt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case