State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Dingabar Dnyanobaji Narnware — 227/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120003352026
e-Filing Number
11-02-2026
Filing Number
293/2026
Filing Date
11-Feb-2026
Registration No
227/2026
Registration Date
11-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
70
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dingabar Dnyanobaji Narnware
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case 227/2026 Summary: Digambar Dnyanobaji Narnware was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition) after pleading guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. The court accepted his voluntary plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the lenient nature of the offense. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 227/2026
Case 227/2026 Summary: Digambar Dnyanobaji Narnware was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition) after pleading guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. The court accepted his voluntary plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the lenient nature of the offense. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- or, in default, suffer simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts