State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Aranvid Mahesh Laysinh — 204/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003242026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

282/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

204/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

66

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Aranvid Mahesh Laysinh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary - S.C.C. No. 204/2026 The accused, Arvind Mahesh Laysing, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted the voluntary guilty plea and, considering the nature of the offense, the accused's lack of criminal antecedents, and his poor financial condition, imposed a lenient sentence. The court convicted and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 204/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary - S.C.C. No. 204/2026 The accused, Arvind Mahesh Laysing, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted the voluntary guilty plea and, considering the nature of the offense, the accused's lack of criminal antecedents, and his poor financial condition, imposed a lenient sentence. The court convicted and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case