State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Shivlal Lakhanlal Kanoje — 203/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003212026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

279/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

203/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

1.Shivlal Lakhanlal Kanoje

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary (203/2026): Shivlal Lakhanlal Kanoje was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after pleading guilty. The court accepted his voluntary plea considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his poor economic circumstances. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
10-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
09-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 203/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary (203/2026): Shivlal Lakhanlal Kanoje was convicted under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after pleading guilty. The court accepted his voluntary plea considering the minor nature of the offense, his lack of prior criminal record, and his poor economic circumstances. He was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.