State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sadik Arif Shaikh — 202/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003202026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

278/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

202/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

62

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sadik Arif Shaikh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 202/2026 The accused, Sadik Arif Shaikh (age 22), pleaded guilty to the offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 202/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 202/2026 The accused, Sadik Arif Shaikh (age 22), pleaded guilty to the offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case