State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Sadik Arif Shaikh — 202/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120003202026
e-Filing Number
09-02-2026
Filing Number
278/2026
Filing Date
09-02-2026
Registration No
202/2026
Registration Date
10-02-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
62
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Sadik Arif Shaikh
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 10-02-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary of Case 202/2026 The accused, Sadik Arif Shaikh (age 22), pleaded guilty to the offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary of Case 202/2026 The accused, Sadik Arif Shaikh (age 22), pleaded guilty to the offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition). The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offence. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or, in default, suffer three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts