State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Dnyaneshwar Yashwantrao Gotamare — 199/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003192026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

277/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

199/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

57

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Dnyaneshwar Yashwantrao Gotamare

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 199/2026 Summary: Dnyaneshwar Yashwantrao Gotamare pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering the nature of the offense and his lack of criminal antecedents, taking a lenient view. The accused was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default punishment of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 199/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 199/2026 Summary: Dnyaneshwar Yashwantrao Gotamare pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering the nature of the offense and his lack of criminal antecedents, taking a lenient view. The accused was convicted and sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default punishment of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case