State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Devanand Mahadev Guddde — 196/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003162026

e-Filing Number

09-02-2026

Filing Number

274/2026

Filing Date

09-Feb-2026

Registration No

196/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

53

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Devanand Mahadev Guddde

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 196/2026 The accused, Devanand Mahadeo Gudde, pleaded guilty to an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his plea, considering his lack of prior criminal record, the nature of the offence, and his voluntary admission of guilt. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 09-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 196/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 196/2026 The accused, Devanand Mahadeo Gudde, pleaded guilty to an offence under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The court accepted his plea, considering his lack of prior criminal record, the nature of the offence, and his voluntary admission of guilt. The Judicial Magistrate convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default provision of three days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case