State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Ejaj Munavwar Shanha — 240/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120003012026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

259/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

240/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

65

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Ejaj Munavwar Shanha

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 240/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ejaj Munavwar Shanha under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after the accused pleaded guilty voluntarily. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days, adopting a lenient view considering the nature of the offence, the accused's poor economic condition, and absence of prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 13-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 240/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 240/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Ejaj Munavwar Shanha under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (read with Section 275 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023) after the accused pleaded guilty voluntarily. The court sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, or in default, simple imprisonment for 3 days, adopting a lenient view considering the nature of the offence, the accused's poor economic condition, and absence of prior criminal antecedents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case