State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Shubham Ramesh Babulkar — 210/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002982026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

256/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

210/2026

Registration Date

10-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

61

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Shubham Ramesh Babulkar

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: SCC 210/2026 The court convicted accused Shubham Ramesh Babulkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The magistrate imposed a lenient sentence considering the nature of the offense, the accused's poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal record, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or face 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 10-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 210/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: SCC 210/2026 The court convicted accused Shubham Ramesh Babulkar under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The magistrate imposed a lenient sentence considering the nature of the offense, the accused's poor financial condition, and absence of prior criminal record, sentencing him to pay a fine of Rs. 200 or face 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case