State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Sanadip Andevsing Kharpate — 267/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002962026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

254/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

267/2026

Registration Date

17-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

58

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Sanadip Andevsing Kharpate

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 267/2026 The accused, Sandip Andevsing Kharpate, pleaded guilty to the offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 17-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 267/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 267/2026 The accused, Sandip Andevsing Kharpate, pleaded guilty to the offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with three days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case