State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Suraj Fattuji Dongaradive — 219/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002952026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

253/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

219/2026

Registration Date

11-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act Section 285

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

1.Suraj Fattuji Dongaradive

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 219/2026 Suraj Fattuji Dongaradive, a 50-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poor financial condition and lack of previous criminal antecedents, and adopted a lenient view considering the nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default punishment of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
11-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
06-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 219/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 219/2026 Suraj Fattuji Dongaradive, a 50-year-old driver, pleaded guilty to an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, noting his poor financial condition and lack of previous criminal antecedents, and adopted a lenient view considering the nature of the offense. The court convicted him and sentenced him to pay a fine of Rs. 200, with a default punishment of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.