State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Raju Madhav Yelmule — 234/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002922026

e-Filing Number

06-02-2026

Filing Number

250/2026

Filing Date

06-Feb-2026

Registration No

234/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

54

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 285

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Raju Madhav Yelmule

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Summary of Case 234/2026: The court convicted Raju Madhav Yelmule for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. Considering the nature of the offense, his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and lenient circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with a default sentence of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 12-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 06-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 234/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of Case 234/2026: The court convicted Raju Madhav Yelmule for an offense under Section 285 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after understanding the charges in Marathi. Considering the nature of the offense, his poverty, lack of criminal antecedents, and lenient circumstances, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 200 with a default sentence of 3 days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case