State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Dipak Ramesh Kalbande — 208/2026
Case under Motor Vehicles Act Section 285. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120002912026
e-Filing Number
06-02-2026
Filing Number
249/2026
Filing Date
06-Feb-2026
Registration No
208/2026
Registration Date
10-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
53
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Dipak Ramesh Kalbande
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 208/2026 The court convicted Dipak Ramesh Kalbande under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition) after he pleaded guilty. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poor financial condition, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, warranting a lenient view. Kalbande was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with a default simple imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-Mar-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
10-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
06-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 208/2026
Case Summary: S.C.C. No. 208/2026 The court convicted Dipak Ramesh Kalbande under Section 285 of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (substance of acquisition) after he pleaded guilty. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea, considering his poor financial condition, lack of criminal antecedents, and the nature of the offense, warranting a lenient view. Kalbande was sentenced to pay a fine of Rs. 200/- with a default simple imprisonment of 3 days. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts