State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Amol Anil Vadbudhe — 183/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 27th April 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120002782026
e-Filing Number
03-02-2026
Filing Number
237/2026
Filing Date
03-Feb-2026
Registration No
183/2026
Registration Date
03-Feb-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
27-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
Last updated 09-Jun-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
839
Police Station
P.S.Narkhed
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed
Respondent(s)
-
1.Amol Anil Vadbudhe
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
27-Apr-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
Case Summary: State v. Amol Anil Wadbudhe (183/2026) The accused was charged with drinking liquor in a public place without permit under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act on 29 December 2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after the charges were explained to him. The court convicted him and, considering his clean record and financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
27-Apr-2026
Disposed
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
22-Apr-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
14-Mar-2026
Order on ExhibitView PDF
-
14-Mar-2026
Awaiting Summons
Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 183/2026
Case Summary: State v. Amol Anil Wadbudhe (183/2026) The accused was charged with drinking liquor in a public place without permit under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act on 29 December 2025. The accused pleaded guilty voluntarily after the charges were explained to him. The court convicted him and, considering his clean record and financial hardship, imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine with 2 days simple imprisonment as default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts