State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Rahul Marotarav Thakare — 180/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002702026

e-Filing Number

02-02-2026

Filing Number

230/2026

Filing Date

02-Feb-2026

Registration No

180/2026

Registration Date

02-Feb-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

458

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

1.Rahul Marotarav Thakare

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

Order on ExhibitView PDF

Case Summary: 180/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rahul Marotrao Thakare for violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
02-Feb-2026

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
02-Feb-2026

Case filed

Registration No. 180/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 180/2026 The Judicial Magistrate convicted Rahul Marotrao Thakare for violating Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949, after he voluntarily pleaded guilty. The court imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with three days simple imprisonment as default punishment, considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and the minor nature of the offense. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.