Santaji Bigar Sheti Credit Co operative Society Ltd. Narkhed. thorugh A. N. Khante vs Sanjay Kishavraoji Kamble Advocate - Adv. A. N. Narnaware — 115/2016
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,142. Status: Steps. Next hearing: 23rd June 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120002592016
Next Hearing
23rd June 2026
Filing Number
216/2016
Filing Date
11-04-2016
Registration No
115/2016
Registration Date
11-04-2016
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Santaji Bigar Sheti Credit Co operative Society Ltd. Narkhed. thorugh A. N. Khante
Adv. Adv. M. R. Charde
Respondent(s)
Sanjay Kishavraoji Kamble Advocate - Adv. A. N. Narnaware
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Steps
Steps
Evidence
Evidence
Evidence
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 21-05-2026 | Steps |
| 24-04-2026 | Steps |
| 14-03-2026 | Evidence |
| 22-01-2026 | Evidence |
| 11-12-2025 | Evidence |
Interim Orders
The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit evidence and documentary submissions regarding a loan dispute with the respondent Sanjay Kishavraoji Kamble. The court found that the petitioner society had valid documentary evidence (bank statements, checks, money orders, notices, and Board resolutions dated 19-01-2011) supporting its claim for recovery of debt, while rejecting the respondent's contentions that the debt was not legally enforceable and that the society had not maintained proper accounts. The case was adjourned for further hearing before the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed on a date to be fixed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court admitted the petitioner's affidavit evidence and documentary submissions regarding a loan dispute with the respondent Sanjay Kishavraoji Kamble. The court found that the petitioner society had valid documentary evidence (bank statements, checks, money orders, notices, and Board resolutions dated 19-01-2011) supporting its claim for recovery of debt, while rejecting the respondent's contentions that the debt was not legally enforceable and that the society had not maintained proper accounts. The case was adjourned for further hearing before the First Class Judicial Magistrate at Narkhed on a date to be fixed. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts