State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Gajanan Vasudev Katolakar — 156/2026
Case under Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act Section 12(a). Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.
S.C.C. - Sum Case
CNR: MHNG120002502026
e-Filing Number
28-01-2026
Filing Number
216/2026
Filing Date
28-01-2026
Registration No
156/2026
Registration Date
28-01-2026
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Decision Date
14th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING
FIR Details
FIR Number
645
Police Station
P.S.Jalalkheda
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda
Respondent(s)
Gajanan Vasudev Katolakar
Hearing History
Judge: 1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed
Disposed
Awaiting Summons
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 14-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 28-01-2026 | Awaiting Summons |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case 156/2026 Summary: Gajanan Wasudeo Katolkar, a 34-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for a gambling offense committed on 18/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. The court, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case 156/2026 Summary: Gajanan Wasudeo Katolkar, a 34-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 12(a) of the Maharashtra Prevention of Gambling Act, 1887 for a gambling offense committed on 18/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Narkhed. The court, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, imposed a lenient sentence of simple imprisonment till rising of court and a fine of Rs. 200 (with 3 days imprisonment in default). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts