State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda vs Duryodhan Naththuji Saryam — 157/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002492026

e-Filing Number

28-01-2026

Filing Number

215/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

157/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

681

Police Station

P.S.Jalalkheda

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government Thorug P.S.O. Jalalkheda

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Duryodhan Naththuji Saryam

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 157/2026 Summary: Duryodhan Natthuji Saryam, a 32-year-old agriculturist, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 after pleading guilty to the charges. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default, considering his poor financial condition and absence of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 157/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 157/2026 Summary: Duryodhan Natthuji Saryam, a 32-year-old agriculturist, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 after pleading guilty to the charges. The Judicial Magistrate accepted his voluntary guilty plea and imposed a lenient sentence of Rs. 200 fine, with 3 days simple imprisonment as default, considering his poor financial condition and absence of prior criminal record. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case