State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Prashant Ashokravji Dabarase — 160/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Disposed: Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002382026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

207/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--CONVICTED ON PLEAD GUILTY / PLEA BARGAINING

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

798

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Prashant Ashokravji Dabarase

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case 160/2026 Summary: Prashant Ashok Dabrase, a 40-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 08/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, Narkhed. Considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200/- with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  4. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case 160/2026 Summary: Prashant Ashok Dabrase, a 40-year-old laborer, was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 for an offense committed on 08/12/2025. The accused voluntarily pleaded guilty before the Judicial Magistrate, Narkhed. Considering his financial hardship, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary plea, the court imposed a lenient sentence: a fine of Rs. 200/- with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case