State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed vs Rajkumar Tulashiram Dhurve — 162/2026

Case under Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84. Status: Awaiting Summons. Next hearing: 24th June 2026.

Awaiting Summons Next hearing 24-Jun-2026 this date has passed

S.C.C. - Sum Case

CNR: MHNG120002362026

e-Filing Number

27-01-2026

Filing Number

205/2026

Filing Date

27-Jan-2026

Registration No

162/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed

Judge

1-Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

813

Police Station

P.S.Narkhed

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Maharashtra Prohibition Act Section 84

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.State Government through P.S.O. Narkhed

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.Rajkumar Tulashiram Dhurve

Case History

  1. 24-Jun-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 22-Apr-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Order on ExhibitView PDF

    Case Summary: 162/2026 Rajkumar Tulshiram Dhotre (age 52) was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 after pleading guilty to charges filed by Narkhed Police Station on 24/12/2025. The Judicial Magistrate, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary guilty plea, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 200, or alternatively 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 14-Mar-2026

    Awaiting Summons

    Civil Judge Jr Division First Class , Narkhed

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 27-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 162/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: 162/2026 Rajkumar Tulshiram Dhotre (age 52) was convicted under Section 84 of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949 after pleading guilty to charges filed by Narkhed Police Station on 24/12/2025. The Judicial Magistrate, considering his poverty, lack of prior criminal record, and voluntary guilty plea, imposed lenient punishment: a fine of Rs. 200, or alternatively 3 days simple imprisonment in default. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case