Shilpa Pravin Parate vs Pravin Rameshrao Parate — 41/2022
Case under Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act Section 12,18,19,20,21,22,23. Status: Awaiting Warrant. Next hearing: 22nd June 2026.
Cri.M.A.
CNR: MHNG120002282022
Next Hearing
22nd June 2026
Filing Number
193/2022
Filing Date
10-03-2022
Registration No
41/2022
Registration Date
10-03-2022
Court
Civil Judge Junior Division , Narkhed
Judge
5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Shilpa Pravin Parate
Adv. Adv. S.N.Pande
Respondent(s)
Pravin Rameshrao Parate
Ramesh Maroti Parate
Pushpa Ramesh Parate
Hearing History
Judge: 5-Jt.Civil Judge Jr.Dvn. J.M.F.C. Narkhed
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
Awaiting Warrant
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 22-05-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 14-03-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 09-02-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 14-01-2026 | Awaiting Warrant |
| 23-12-2025 | Awaiting Warrant |
Interim Orders
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 41/2022 Shilpa Pravin Parate filed a domestic violence petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking custody of her 8-year-old son Ansh, alleging merciless beatings and harassment by her husband (Pravin Rameshrao Parate) and in-laws. Pravin contested the application, claiming the child resides happily with him and receives proper care. The court rejected the application on July 28, 2022, ruling that custody matters are better decided under the Guardian and Wards Act by the appropriate forum, and directed the applicant to approach that proper authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cri.M.A. No. 41/2022 Shilpa Pravin Parate filed a domestic violence petition under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005, seeking custody of her 8-year-old son Ansh, alleging merciless beatings and harassment by her husband (Pravin Rameshrao Parate) and in-laws. Pravin contested the application, claiming the child resides happily with him and receives proper care. The court rejected the application on July 28, 2022, ruling that custody matters are better decided under the Guardian and Wards Act by the appropriate forum, and directed the applicant to approach that proper authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts